|
|
Location: Blogs Dan's Blog |
 |
| Posted by: Dan McGrath |
2/9/2012 |
|
Election Integrity is Under Assault
When you’re taking flak, it means you’re over the target. By the extraordinary reaction by anti-integrity forces to the introduction of a Voter ID Constitutional Amendment, it seems that we’re very close to the target. It also seems that many groups are looking to protect the constituency of illegal voters and they’re pulling out all the stops.
The anti-ID rhetoric is reaching a fevered pitch, with members of Isaiah (a radical left quasi-religious coalition) calling Voter ID “a devilish enterprise" at a recent Capitol press conference. They’re holding rallies. The League of Women Voters is touring the state with a breathless (but completely unfounded) message about Voter ID preventing grandma, minorities, students and soldiers from voting.
A letter to the editor campaign is in full swing and our opponents are getting 10 letters published for every one in favor of Voter ID.
They are lobbying legislators against passing the Voter ID amendment in large, organized numbers.
They packed a recent committee hearing to pitch lies about the amendment ending absentee voting and Election Day registration.
The truth is Voter ID will not eliminate Election Day registration – only vouching. It will not eliminate absentee voting – only require proof of the voters identity (such as a verifiable ID card number on the ballot envelope). It will not prevent any eligible voter who desires to vote from doing so.
Groups like the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, Isaiah, the ACLU and NAACP are making ludicrous claims like 700,000 Minnesotans will be unable to vote if photo ID is required. They’ve engaged in this kind of hyperbolic speculation before, but when met with the challenge of proving their claims in court, their arguments fall to pieces.
Here’s what the Indiana Supreme Court said about the League of Women Voters’ challenge of that state’s voter ID law when the Court heard the League’s appeal in 2010:
“The relief the plaintiffs seek is a declaration that it was beyond the power of the legislature to require any voters to identify themselves at the polls using a photo ID. Voters have long been required to identify themselves at the polls by announcing and signing their names. Neither of the constitutional provisions the plaintiffs invoke prevents the legislature from promulgating a new way for voters to identify themselves. It is within the power of the legislature to require voters to identify themselves at the polls using a photo ID. The plaintiffs' claim for relief cannot be granted and dismissal was appropriate. No individual voter has alleged that the Voter ID Law has prevented him or her from voting or inhibited his or her ability to vote in any way.”
The League is persistent with their disproven arguments, though. When they teamed up with two other anti-election integrity organizations, Common Cause and the NAACP to try to stop Georgia’s Voter ID law, they made the familiar claims that scores of voters would be disenfranchised because of some inexplicable inability to obtain free state-issued photo ID. They took their claims to federal court and won a temporary restraining order based on the apocalyptic scenario they painted, but on the merits of the case, the League was again rebuffed. On examining the evidence, the Court upheld the Voter ID law and decreed:
“Plaintiffs’ failure, despite their efforts, to uncover anyone who can attest to the fact that he/she will be prevented from voting provides significant support for the conclusion that the Photo ID requirement does not unduly burden the right to vote.”
Where the bogus claims of disenfranchisement have been repeatedly disproven in court, the reality of the threat of voter fraud has been proven in the courts with criminal convictions in record numbers of late.
James O’Keefe, whose undercover videos helped take down ACORN and who exposed the ease of voting in the names of dead people was in Minnesota recently and released a new video exposing how vulnerable Minnesota’s election system is (see video above or check it out at WeWantVoterID.com).
We know the truth, but right now, it’s being buried by an avalanche of misinformation and Propaganda.
Take Action! We’re asking you to take two steps to counter the lies and distortions and help advance the Voter ID amendment.
|
|
| Permalink |
Trackback |
Comments (11)
Add Comment
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Doug Erbeck on
2/12/2012 |
| I couldn't agree more. It is very easy to get an ID, why, except for fraud would anyone refuse? |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Paul Bolin on
2/16/2012 |
| For every illegal vote, a citizen somewhere in America is disenfranchised. That doesn't matter to the left though; the illegal vote is one of their key constituencies. It is so transparent. www.facebook.com/bolinforsenate www.bolinforsenate.com |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Steve Hansmann on
2/16/2012 |
Mr. McGrath, You've convinced me for the need for picture, state-sanctioned, official identification cards to vote. But....considering the utter debacle, fraud, and incompetence in Iowa and Maine, it should only be used, or even needed, for republicans. Thanks to your party for clarifying this for me. |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By tom smith on
2/20/2012 |
It seem absurd that when the only ones charged with voter fraud are a group of felons who did not know that they weren't allowed to vote, voted, that we should spend millions on this issue. Why not just tell all felons that they can't vote until their right to vote has been activated again. Just another [profanity deleted] republican plot to steal elections and keep people from voting. So [profanity deleted] you Republicans. By the way, I am an Independent who will never vote for a [profanity deleted] repuklican. |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By dan.mcgrath on
2/20/2012 |
First of all, you don't get convicted for "accidental" fraud. The law is ineligible voter KNOWINGLY votes." It has to be proven that you 1. voted while ineligible and 2. Knew you weren't allowed to vote. Further, you need to spend more time researching the issue if you think ineligible felon voters are Minnesota's only election problem. Here's a good place to start: http://www.electionintegritywatch.com/2012/01/26/election-integrity-reports-roundup/
|
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Bob Olson on
2/20/2012 |
| The fact that so-called fiscal conservatives would lobby for an amendment that would cost the state millions to implement to solve a non-existent problem (voter fraud) is beyond me. I'm fine with fiscal restraint, but at least be consistent. This amendment is a power move, plain and simple. |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Dan Lang on
2/20/2012 |
I see no viable reason that an ID should not be presented to vote. If you are an up and up person it should be no big deal. Yes it may take an hour out of your day to get one, but in my opinion, it should be required.
|
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By dan.mcgrath on
2/20/2012 |
@Bob - Are you talking point dependent, or do you think and research for yourself? To answer that, check this out: http://www.electionintegritywatch.com/2012/01/26/election-integrity-reports-roundup/
Learn something? How much is the continued faith and confidence in our republic worth? More than a train that only serves a neighborhood, that most people in the neighborhood don't use? To meet that threshold, voter ID would have to cost over $1 billion. It's only around $10 million by the highest estimates. What's more important? Election integrity for the whole state, or a whole new inefficient form of transportation for 7 miles? |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Pete Como on
2/21/2012 |
| Up until now you have received 8 comments. This issue must not be so important to Minnesotans. But the MPR and other media attention must shake a few dollars loose from your secret money people. Who is paying for your propaganda? Please come into the light. |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Wantdemocracy on
2/27/2012 |
| For any of you (Paul above) who really think Democrats rely upon, or even spend ANY TIME thinking about illegal voters in a positive light, is the most absurd thing I have heard in a long time, and I'm 50, so I've had time to hear some dumb things. OMG. We all know why this is a Right issue. We are not dumb. If it passes we will be watching closely to any and all disenfrachisement. And any true AMERICAN would be concerned more about that than anything else. |
|
|
Re: Fight Back for Voter ID |
By Barb on
3/16/2012 |
democracy is suppose to be for people! democracy in America is whatever the government says is for people. Sorry, but I don't know what people used democracy to build this state as weakened as it's become. all results of democracy in Minnesota says people want the government to take over! that's perverted...
exceptions made to any rules, opens the door to disenfranchise the honest! |
|
|
|
|
|