Minnesota Majority - Standing Together for Traditional Values

| Login      
 
Location: BlogsDan's Blog    
Posted by: Dan McGrath 1/17/2012

Thousands of Voters Challenged After Ballots Were Counted

Minnesota Majority today released a report on voters flagged for challenge in the statewide voter registration system (SVRS) because of official election mailings to their listed addresses being returned as undeliverable by the United States Postal Service. The mailings, commonly known as postal verification cards (PVCs) are sent to newly registered voters as a means of confirming their provided address and residence at that address. Thousands of voters were flagged for challenge following the 2008 and 2010 general election in Minnesota. 

“The PVC is the only real test we have for confirming a voter’s residence, and we often don’t perform that verification until after a person has voted,” said Minnesota Majority president Jeff Davis. “After the 2008 election, over 6,000 Election Day registrants were found to have provided addresses that were undeliverable and after 2010 there were over 1,200 more that remain unexplained even after accounting for voters who moved shortly after voting. This is a strong indicator of the possibility of voter fraud.”
 
A 2009 law change now requires election officials to investigate the reasons for PVC card returns and refer suspicious cases to county attorneys for investigation. Under that new law, 399 suspicious returned PVC cards have thus-far been referred to county attorneys, according to a March 2011 report issued by the secretary of state’s office.
 
The problem, said Davis, is that be believes prosecution of any voter fraud discovered in the course of those investigations is next to impossible. “If the voter registration says John Doe at 123 Main Street, that’s all the prosecutors have to go on. If that’s a false identity, there’s no way to tie that to the real person who committed the fraud.”
 
PVC cards may be undeliverable for a number of reasons, including no such person at the address; no such address; the address isn’t residential; the address is a vacant lot or vacant property; the address is condemned and other reasons.
 
Minnesota law requires voters to register at least 20 days before an election so that the information they provide and their eligibility to vote can be verified by election workers before they vote on Election Day. However, Election Day registration creates an exception. People who register at the polling place are given a ballot without first being subject to the same scrutiny.
 
Election Day registrants can account for as many as 25% of all votes cast in a typical election. For those voters, the postal verification card isn’t mailed until after their ballots have been accepted and counted. Voters whose PVCs are returned as undeliverable will be flagged for challenge if they show up at the next election, but meanwhile, their ballots have already been accepted. 

“This is an example of why creating two classes of voters is unacceptable,” said Davis. “You shouldn’t be subject to less scrutiny than everyone else, just because you waited until the last minute to register. Less responsible voters are allowed to cut in line and cast a ballot without being validated and this is what happens.”

Read the full report here.

Take Action: Contact your legislators. Tell them to support voter ID.

Donate to the cause. Well-funded national organizations are gearing up to fight ratification of Minnesota's Voter ID Constitutional amendment and they're prepared to spend millions of dollars on the effort. To fight back and ensure passage, we need financial help. We don't have to match our opponents dollar for dollar, but we need some resources to counter the misinformation campaigns that are getting underway. Please help us enact voter ID with a contribution.

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (3)   Add Comment
Re: Unverifiable Election Day Voter Registrations Show Need for Voter ID    By Steven on 2/3/2012
Yesterday, a known trouble maker, Jeff Johnson, testified before the Senate committee hearing about this amendment. He claimed to have been a retired Army officer with extensive knowledge about voter participation issues. All of this is untrue. He never served in the military. His voter participation activities include organizing attempts to subvert voter ID laws in Georgia and Indiana. He has been seen in South Carolina doing similar organizing. Watch out for this character.

Re: Unverifiable Election Day Voter Registrations Show Need for Voter ID    By Not supported by data on 2/20/2012
http://www.truthaboutfraud.org/

Your claims are not supported by objective research. I don't expect my comment to be published. But if you truly support freedom of expression and the marketplace of ideas you will publish a dissenting viewpoint.

Re: Unverifiable Election Day Voter Registrations Show Need for Voter ID    By Michael Laabs on 2/20/2012
You a searching for a problem where there really isn't one. are you offering rides to the elderly so they can get their voter ID cards? Your depictions of "voter fraud," people is terribly distoted. Maybe you guys should protest with Klan Hats!!


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
Founder's Quote of the Week

"No pecuniary consideration is more urgent, than the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt: on none can delay be more injurious, or an economy of time more valuable." --George Washington, Message to the House of Representatives, 1793

  Print    Minimize
 

Our Bookstore
    Minimize
 

 
February 22, 2012
 
YOU ARE HERE:    Home
Copyright 2007 - 2011 by Minnesota Majority
Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement
web security