| Login      
 
Location: BlogsJeff's Blog    
Posted by: Jeff Davis 12/15/2007

One must wonder how a “reporter” like Rachel Stassen-Berger of the Pioneer Press actually goes about the process of writing a “story” about an organization with which she personally disagrees. Let’s give it a try.

Start by checking your journalism ethics at the door when you come to work. Conduct some interviews with the organization's principals, looking for dirt you can use against them. Scour the organization’s website and find something you can use out-of-context to convey a message that was never intended by the author. Throw in few misquotes and some restatements of the facts, and presto, you have a column fit for the editorial pages.

But that’s not where Ms. Stassen-Berger’s most recent "story" about Minnesota Majority appears. The Pioneer Press actually tries to pawn this kind of stuff off as “news”. Mainstream media bias in the Twin Cities is so thick you can cut it with a knife. But readers aren’t stupid and many are choosing to drop their subscriptions. One has to wonder when executive management at these organizations is going to wake-up and realize that bias is bad for business.

COMPARISION OF STASSEN-BERGER'S COLUMN TO THE TRUTH

Stassen-Berger’s The Truth
In the original version of her column she wrote, “In the ad, Kiffmeyer said Democrats in the state support ‘socialistic’ universal health care.” The ad says “Liberal politicians are trying to impose a state-sponsored universal healthcare plan upon all Minnesotans.” The truth is that there are liberal politicians on both sides of the isle.
"There has been no recent proposal to have the state take over all health care coverage." There have been several proposals made by Minnesota state politicians to increase government involvement in health care.
"Minnesota Majority's Web site features an issue paper on health care, which backs consumer-driven health care and claims that racial diversity and single-parent households negatively affect health in the United States." There was absolutely no tinge of racism in the health care issue paper.  Nor did it imply any negative judgment about single-parent households.  It simply stated a demographic fact that helps explain differences in medical statistics between countries. The author of the issue paper contacted Stassen-Berger directly offering to help resolve her confusion.  But the "reporter" didn't bother to return his telephone call, apparently more interested in pursuing her agenda to try to discredit our organization.  Because people like Stassen-Berger had trouble understanding the author's original intent, the issue paper has been updated so as to make the author's point perfectly clear, such that even Stassen-Berger should now understand it.
"Jeff Davis, who has been active in pushing for a Minnesota anti-gay marriage amendment, is its president." Jeff Davis has never used the terminology “anti-gay marriage amendment”. It is a term made-up by Left-wing media types to try to put the proposed legislation in a negative light.

 

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (7)   Add Comment
Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By p johnson on 12/24/2007
I do not want or believe in state-sponsored universal healthcare in Minnesota or in USA. I am retired and buy my own insurance and doing just fine. So will others. I can not afford your kind of universal insurance. Our health insurance gives me the freedom to chose where and when I can be taken care of. Stop raising my taxes.

Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By Barb on 1/6/2008
Unqualified! Star and Tribune Must be government subsidized. We won't subscribe and we will soon be cancelling the pioneer press.

Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By humanendurance on 1/6/2008
I stopped watching all media...don't read the paper... all bias bs. Thank GOD there is truth on the radio. Thank GOD, people with human qualities are voicing it. It's too bad people with human qualities don't exist in the government of a country of what used to be free and used to conduct democracy...the government fails to encourage human qualities and takes advantage of those that have it. I suppose they can't encourage what they don't have. If it doesn't cost money they won't consider it.

Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By Barb on 1/6/2008
It's too bad bias gets paid. I am cancelling the paper, news media (tv) and any other deceitful media. Certainly someone has to proof read and obviously the focus IS to be bias...MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT.

Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By John Carlson on 1/13/2008
Stassen-Berger should find a job that she can handle. Misinterpretation of written and verbal information, where there is no intent to deceive or manipulate, is patently inexcusable. Then again, she may not be a suitable employee anywhere if she is incapable of understanding simple concepts like truth, honesty and fact. Too many in the media and politics have the same problem and the only solution is for them to lose their jobs too.

Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By Capt. B. on 1/13/2008
There is a reason the two twin cities largest "news" papers are nicknamed the Star Diaper and the Pioneer Pus. All too often I've read articles on which I've had personal knowledge, to find that the reporter twisted the facts or words or omitted information to give the story whatever spin The REPORTER wanted it to have. TV and radio is no better. Until the media is FORCED to concentrate on the story (facts) instead of rateings (MONEY) , spins to the highest bidder ai all we can expect

Re: A Prescription for Media Bias    By MaddMedic on 1/23/2008
Deregulate insurance and let the consumer shop for the best possible price!! Government seems to think that we cannot make our own choices and as long as we have liberal politicians and journalists spewing their garbage about how we should live our lives, they are goingt o do so until we say ENOUGH!!


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 

Founder's Quote of the Week

"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt." --Samuel Adams, essay in The Public Advertiser, 1749

  Print    Minimize
 
Featured Book

"Green Hell explains why Americans can't afford to fall for Al Gore's `the debate is over' line on global warming. While we're all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists."
--Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard

"Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth' on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous."
--Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes

"Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans."
--Dick Morris, FOX News commentator and former political consultant to Bill Clinton

"This book describes why the world can't afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists' vision of our future."
--VACLAV KLAUS, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic

"Free market capitalism is still the best path to prosperity. Green Hell is a must-read for anyone who wants to keep America on that path and away from Soviet-style command-and-control environmentalism."
--Larry Kudlow, Host, CNBC's The Kudlow Report

  Print    Minimize
 
Our Bookstore
    Minimize
 

 
February 09, 2010
 
YOU ARE HERE:    Home
Copyright 2007 - 2009 by Minnesota Majority
Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement