|
|
Location: Blogs Dan's Blog |
 |
| Posted by: Dan McGrath |
6/28/2010 |
|
Today, Minnesota Majority released a report of its findings on ineligible felons voting in the 2008 Minnesota General Election. Our research on felons voting began over a year ago and we believe the new report is the most comprehensive documentation of voter fraud by ineligible felons yet compiled for Minnesota.
On October 14th, 2009, Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner announced to the local press that her office had charged 23 felons for illegally voting or registering to vote, saying, “the numbers are very small.” But Minnesota Majority’s independent research revealed a much higher number of felon voters.
Using data obtained from the Minnesota Department of Corrections, Minnesota Majority found evidence that hundreds of ineligible felons may have voted the 2008 General Election. Evidence was submitted to the Hennepin and Ramsey County Attorneys on October 16, 2009.
“I think people should be concerned that most of the instances of felon voter fraud would have never been detected had it not been for our independent research,” said Minnesota Majority’s president, Jeff Davis. “It begs the question of what other problems officials may be missing and how long these problems have gone undetected.
”The report points out that since there is a list of felons that can be compared to voter history files, checking for potential felon voters is a fairly straightforward process. Other forms of fraud are much more difficult to detect, however, such as individuals voting under an assumed identity. Minnesota Majority believes if officials are failing to detect, investigate and prosecute felon voters, they are probably missing other forms of voter fraud as well.
The report is critical of failures by election officials and law enforcement to prevent, detect and deter fraudulent voting by convicted felons. “The apparent unresponsiveness and stonewalling on the part of election and law enforcement officials creates the impression that they may be deliberately dragging their feet on the investigation and prosecution of election fraud in order to maintain the myth of Minnesota as a leader in clean, well-run elections. In reality, we have found Minnesota’s election integrity to be lacking in many aspects,” reads a portion of the report’s executive summary.
The report concludes, “Failure to act now sends a signal to potential fraudulent voters that voter fraud is a safe way to influence elections because perpetrators in all likelihood will never be caught or prosecuted. Even those few who have been prosecuted received only a slap on the wrist: a small fine and part of a day in jail.”
Minnesota Majority is calling on election and law enforcement officials to make investigating and prosecuting voter fraud a priority to preserve public confidence in our elections.
We are running out of time to complete our research into other suspected problems arising from the 2008 election. In September (just two months away), the counties will begin destroying election records from 2008, as they are only retained for 22 months. Additionally, the statute of limitations on election crimes is two years and for the 2008 election, will expire in November. Instances of election crimes stemming from 2008 that aren't caught and prosecuted by then will slip into the shadows forever.
We're racing against the clock. To complete our work protecting election integrity in Minnesota, we need to raise $20,000 in just two weeks or our work on elections will come to a halt, unfinished. Just recently, we uncovered evidence that suggests ballot box stuffing in several precincts. More investigation into this apparent discrepancy is critically needed, in addition to our ongoing work to protect election integrity.
Take Action: Please make a secure online contribution toward election integrity today. Absentee voting for the 2010 election cycle already began on Friday and election records from 2008 will be destroyed in two months. No one else is doing this work. Please contribute to Minnesota Majority now to help ensure clean fair elections this year.
Read the Report on Fraudulent Votes Cast by Ineligible Felons in the 2008 General Election.
Channel 5 News coverage: Watchdog Group Says Felons Are Voting Illegally
UPDATE: See Fox News story "Felons Voting Illegally May Have Put Franken Over the Top in Minnesota" |
|
| Permalink |
Trackback |
Comments (13)
Add Comment
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Rambo on
6/29/2010 |
| I see this nonsense from both sides. Election math is far from perfect, but it is reasonably accurate. Conservatives supported the Bush election on a tiny margin. Liberals supported the Franken election on a tiny margin. This type spans wealth, poor, felons, etc etc etc. However, at the end of the day, the fraud is small and likely balances out. Why would I give my hard earned money to you? I'm a capitalist. Are you providing me with a product? What am I getting in return? Democrats and Republicans are the same party. Jesse Ventura was the exception. |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By dan.mcgrath on
6/29/2010 |
| Yes - we do provide a product. Information, analysis and tools to make political involvement easier. We do all this for no charge to our members. We rely on generous contributions from those who see the value in what we do and can afford to pitch in. |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Barb on
6/30/2010 |
| I believe in your service, Minnesota Majority. Many things brought to the attention of the public are greatly appreciated. I'm not a capitalist like Rambo up there, but I'll use my freedom of choice to give what I can, as I believe it is capitalism that gives me freedom from government dependency. Thank you for your work and standing for truth and integrity. God Bless! |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By dan.mcgrath on
6/30/2010 |
| Thank you, Barb. I appreciate your passion for truth! |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Pat B on
7/8/2010 |
Dan, With all due respect to you and cred to the other 'Mac': "You have got to be kidding!" Less than 30 for sure plus hundreds of maybes against millions of voters does not a case of 'stolen' make. It doesn't even qualify as "statistically significant" What a pathetic case and a case, clearly, not made. I suggest you and your's go find a real problem. Like district gerrymandering or corporations are 'people'.
And the solicitation email is much worse as it asks for $$ without any evidence whatsoever, merely smears.
|
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By dan.mcgrath on
7/8/2010 |
| I guess you didn't actually READ the report We have solid evidence of WAY more than 30 felon-voters - and felons voting is only one of a myriad of problems we've identified with the 2008 election. Felons are the easiest voter-fraudsters to catch. There's a list of them. Our trusted officials couldn't even do that. How do you trust the election system at all when the easiest type of fraud to both prevent and to detect isn't being caught and the laws designed to uphold election integrity aren't even being followed? |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Mike W. on
7/12/2010 |
To Pat B & Rambo, Once again, you marxists demonstrate you can't argue with the facts, so just pooh pooh them instead. I wonder how you would feel if the tables were turned? We are losing our freedoms you fools and you 2 are the useful idiots who will ensure we lose them faster. |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Greg S. on
7/13/2010 |
I guess all I can say is: If it sounds like fraud, looks like fraud, can be proved as fraud, and seems to benefit the democratic candidate; Then appearently the MN Secretary of State has to ignore it instead of doing his job.
|
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Steven Paige Streeter on
9/13/2010 |
Wow. Thank God I am not part of what you call the Minnesota Majority. Is that all you guys can do is name call and call everyone a Marxist who doesn't agree with you? Reactionary non-logic never wins debates nor does it put your position in any better light. This story is a non-story. I laughed with Al during his campaign and came around to know him as a decent guy. Go ahead - throw the gum. Thats great - just doesn't add anything to the debate. For you on whatreallyhappened.com, which isn't exactly your average neo-con site...Peace,SPS |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Keith M on
9/13/2010 |
I saw in the news you've found 341 felons that voted. Do you have any evidence of HOW the felons voted? Until I see that, the study didn't prove any change in the election outcomes. The closest statistic I was able to find is that 68% of prison inmates vote for democrats, which still didn't give Coleman the edge. You would need 91% of the felon's votes going to Franken, but you'd also need to take off any votes from Coleman's total. I'm in no way justifying voter fraud, but the media is really misunderstanding this report as if Franken surely stole the election.
Not to be a Marxist traitor or anything, just sayin'. |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Jeff on
9/13/2010 |
| Where can we see the letter sent to Mark Ritchie in October of 2008? I wanted to see what information he had before the election, if he had the proper information before the election and he did nothing he could be removed from his post for dereliction of duty. |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By Jack Shot on
9/13/2010 |
| Never saw as much BS in one pLACE |
|
|
Re: New Report on Felon Voter Fraud |
By dan.mcgrath on
9/13/2010 |
| First, our report isn't about Franken or Coleman. It's about fraud. Who's in favor of voter fraud? Second, there are way more than 341. That's just the number we had obtained copies of court documents and voter roster pages for at that time. See our updated report. We expect 1,000 prosecutable cases of voter fraud to emerge from our research on ineligible felons voting. |
|
|
|
|
|