Minnesota Majority - Standing Together for Traditional Values

| Login      
 
Location: BlogsDan's Blog    
Posted by: Dan McGrath 12/8/2009

As Copenhagen Begins, EPA Provides President Obama Unilateral Authority

Deliberately timed to coincide with the start of the United Nations’ climate conference in Copenhagen, the Environmental Protection Agency on Monday declared that carbon dioxide, a naturally occurring gas that’s essential to life on Earth, poses a threat to human health and welfare. This determination clears the way for the federal government to begin restricting energy production and restructuring the entire American economy.

The EPA cited a 2007 Supreme Court ruling declaring that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, but the science upon which that ruling was based has now been called into question when emails and internal documents between the UN’s leading climate change scientists were leaked to the public. Contained within the files was evidence of suppression, manipulation and destruction of climate data. The emails revealed that the entire historical climate record that is the basis for all determinations of climate change is based on inaccurate data and has been manipulated to match a political and economic agenda.
 
If the EPA acts unilaterally to restrict carbon dioxide emissions, the impact on the economy could be even worse than a cap and trade law enacted by Congress. The reasons for this move by the Obama Administration’s EPA appear to be two-fold: First, to establish authority for President Obama to make enforceable agreements at the UN’s climate conference even in lieu of a treaty or Congressional approval; and Second to give the administration leverage to coerce the Senate into enacting a cap and trade law just to lessen the economic damage that could be wrought by the EPA’s heavy-handed restrictions of CO2.
 
At this moment, our national economy is under threat by carbon regulation schemes on three fronts: The Copenhagen conference designed to create a world carbon regulatory authority which could undermine our sovereignty; The cap and trade bill that’s been passed by the House of Representatives and now awaits Senate approval; and the Obama Administration’s decision that it can regulate carbon dioxide via the EPA even without approval by Congress.
 
For a preview of what this could mean to American families, one can look to Germany, where due to restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions, electricity costs three-times more than in the US and gasoline is now $8.00 per gallon.
 
You must make your voice heard loud and clear right now. This is no longer a far-away possibility. It’s happening as you read this. Time’s up. 

Take Action: If you don’t think it’s a good idea to dramatically slash domestic energy production at a cost of trillions of dollars and untold American jobs over the politics of a discredited climate scare, pick up your phone and call the White House right now. Tell the Obama Administration you won’t stand for this unparalleled fleecing of the American public. Call (202) 456-1111 to be heard today.

Sign the online petition at NoCapAndTrade.com to send a message to Congress demanding that they "stand down" on climate change legislation.

Share this message with family, friends and neighbors asking them to take action as well. 

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (4)   Add Comment
Re: Obama’s EPA to Bypass Congress, Regulate CO2 Without a Vote    By Rick on 12/14/2009
Wrong Dan,

The CRU emails do NOT reveal your misconception. Your illogical meme of the day, convenient for your denier status is a joke of epic proportions. The joke is on you.

Not only are you wrong, but even non elites like myself are laughing at your lack of common sense.

I read sources of integrity and merit to find commons sense truth. You are NOT a source in and of yourself, yet it's plane you expect to be taken as a source.

Here are real sources of merit: (If you deny they are, explain in detail why?)

http://newstrust.net/stories/504076/toolbar

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/07/opinion/07krugman.html?_r=1

Dan, I have made it clear over and over that you have not shown anything near reality with your constant denying. What is motivating you to behave this way? Money? Power? Both?

Re: Obama’s EPA to Bypass Congress, Regulate CO2 Without a Vote    By dan.mcgrath on 12/14/2009
That's a sorry bit of spin you've posted. The point that seems to be missed about the tree ring data is that they have demonstrated it is inaccurate, yet the climate history upon which the warmists' theory is based is reconstructed from this tree ring data that we now know doesn't coincide with actual tempreatures as they have claimed. Most revealing is the computer code used in the climate modelling software. Inputting random series of numbers will, 9 times in 10 produce the "hockey stick" result. The whole computer model is a fraud and the entire climate history is called into question.

See here: http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/revenge-of-the-computer-nerds/

In addition, we have now learned that the original data used to construct the climate models and charts has been destroyed so it can't be verified. What kind of scientists destroy the data that is the foundation for their work?

Re: Obama’s EPA to Bypass Congress, Regulate CO2 Without a Vote    By Dan on 12/14/2009
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/understanding_climategates_hid.html Here's a bit more about the significance of "hide the decline."

Re: Obama’s EPA to Bypass Congress, Regulate CO2 Without a Vote    By Barb on 12/15/2009
Norton, you're a hero!


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
Founder's Quote of the Week

"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.' To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, not longer susceptible of any definition." --Thomas Jefferson, Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank, 1791

  Print    Minimize
 

Our Bookstore
    Minimize
 

 
February 04, 2012
 
YOU ARE HERE:    Home
Copyright 2007 - 2011 by Minnesota Majority
Terms Of Use  |  Privacy Statement
web security