|
|
|
Author: |
Dan McGrath |
Created: |
3/10/2008 |
 |
|
Dan is a Minneapolis resident. Living in the heart of the beast, he brings an urban perspective to Minnesota conservatism. |
|
Minnesota Health Care at Risk |
|
|
By Dan McGrath on
3/28/2008
|
|
|
 The state senate approved the health care bill ( SF3099) on Thursday by a vote of 41-22, but legislators on both sides of the aisle have deep concerns about the nature of the bill. Governor Tim Pawlenty has withdrawn his support of the bill in its current form.
DFL Senator Sharon Erickson Ropes said the bill “puts Minnesota health care at risk,” and suggests that many legislators don’t even understand huge sections of the bill. “This is all very confusing,” she said.
Republican Senator David Haan is worried about privacy intrusions in the bill, like body mass index monitoring. "This kind of active intrusion in people's lives goes way beyond what's necessary," he said.
Senator Ray Vanderveer (R – Forest Lake) summed up the bill saying, “We want to encourage people to get health insurance by putting a tax on it and making it cost more.”
The governor said the current bill is unacceptable to him, but added that he thinks the bill is still “fixable.”
The House has yet to take up it’s version of the health care bill ( HF3391) in a floor vote, but it is expected soon.
There are significant differences between the House’s bill and the Senate’s. If the bill is approved in the House, it will go to a conference committee between the two chambers to hammer out differences. Significant changes sometimes occur in conference committees, and completely new elements are not out of the question.
|
 |
|
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
How Much is that Gorilla Cage Going to Set Me Back? |
|
|
By Dan McGrath on
3/27/2008
|
|
|
Bonding. A government method of borrowing for large public works projects. Bonds generally mature in 30 years and require repayment with interest.
Bonding is an effective mechanism for funding big projects that benefit future generations, like building new highways. If a road lasts 30 years, stretching payment for its construction to span its useful life makes sense.
This year, nearly a billion dollars in new bonding has been proposed and is now being debated in the state legislature. In light of our current budget shortfall, and to preserve the state's bond rating, the governor wants to limit borrowing this session. Ever eager to bring home the pork, the legislature wants to see how high they can push the numbers. Several of the projects they want to fund beg evaluation of their necessity, especially considering that the current budget already spends more than available revenues.
Frank Moe (DFL – 4A) wants over $13.5 million for new state trails and Melissa Hortman (DFL – 47B) tacked on another $2.1 million for trails in Anoka County. Throw in another $2.4 million for other non-metro trails and we’re looking at almost $20 million for trails.
Shelly Madore (DFL – 37A) wanted to borrow $5 million for a Minnesota Zoo “Master Plan.” She only got $1 million in the omnibus bonding bill for pre-design and design of the “Master Plan,” but not to worry. The Zoo will still get a nice piece of the bonding package with another $8.5 million for “asset preservation.”
Thanks to Alice Hausman (DFL - 66B), Como Zoo is set to receive $11 million for new gorilla cages and Mike Jaros (DFL – 7B) didn’t miss bringing back a piece of the zoo pie, snagging $1.2 million for polar bears at the Duluth/Superior Zoo.
Kim Norton (DFL – 29B) is looking to bring home $4 million to expand a volleyball court in Rochester (don’t you just need sand and a net?) and Scott Kranz (DFL – 51A) wants a million to fix up a soccer field in Blaine for a total of $5 million interest-bearing state dollars going to local, amateur sports facilities.
Tony Sertich (DFL – 5B) is trying to snag half-a-million for the town of Floodwood to acquire land on which to build a business park. A few questions might come to mind with this one. First, why does the state care whether Floodwood has a business park? Second, where the heck is Floodwood? And third, why is government purchasing land for what is inherently a private, commercial venture?
Minneapolis legislators are keen to bring home the bacon as well. Margaret Kelliher (DFL – 60A) seeks $3 million for predesign of renovations to Orchestra Hall. Thanks to Frank Hornstein (DFL – 60B) and Phyllis Kahn (DFL – 59B), Minneapolis gets $2 million to purchase new lighting that “preserves the natural night environment” (seems like that should be free). Another $70 million is appropriated for the Central Corridor light rail line.
The above examples only begin to scratch the surface, revealing the stockpiles of pork lurking inside the bonding bill. See the bill for yourself to find out what other questionable spending priorities legislators want to borrow money for in a deficit year.
Contact your elected officials and tell them to "Cut The Pork!"
|
 |
|
Comments (2)
|
|
|
|
New Health Care Proposals Unnecessary, Expensive and Intrusive |
|
|
By Dan McGrath on
3/20/2008
|
|
|
|
We recently interviewed Rep. Tom Emmer (R, Delano) and Twila Brase (Citizens' Council on Health Care) regarding the health care reform measures that have been intoduced by DFL legislators (SF3099 / HF3391). All Minnesotans should watch these interviews to understand how these so-called 'reforms' will ultimately impact the way health care is sold and delivered in Minnesota.
The bills (SF3099 / HF3391) are currently being hurried through the state legislature. Supporters say it will make health insurance more affordable and accessible. The reality is that these proposals will do neither. Instead, the bills will target smokers, drinkers and people with some extra pounds for state-sponsored lifestyle modification initiatives, create new layers of expensive government bureaucracy and encumber small business owners with costly new administration mandates.
The creation of a proposed Health Insurance Exchange, the centerpiece of the bill (number SF3099), is ostensibly designed to provide to employees of small companies who purchase their own individual health insurance the same tax break as employers receive. In reality, the Exchange will increase the cost of privately-purchased health care by at least 2%, burdening taxpayers with new taxes and fees, and forcing small businesses to become bill collectors for insurance companies with whom they are otherwise unassociated.
The cost of medical services would actually increase under this proposal. Hospitals, other care providers and insurance companies will be billed for the Health Improvement Fund. The fund will seek to collect $40 million from health care providers, the expense of which will naturally be passed on to consumers.
A portion of SF3099 deals with sharing private medical records across multiple agencies and organizations, keeping track of your lifestyle choices, how much you weigh, funding third-party organizations to implement programs to cajole and coerce you into behavior choices preferred by the state, and recruiting as many people as possible into the state’s medical welfare programs (Medical Assistance and MinnesotaCare).
The ultimate goal of the bill appears to be to expand the number of people dependent on the state for their medical care. The bill provides bounties paid to organizations and individuals that recruit new enrollees in the state’s medical welfare programs. Schools will be asked to single-out students who receive free or reduced-rate school lunch as targets for recruitment activities. If a school is successful in enrolling a student’s family, they will earn a $25 bounty. To entice potential new enrollees, the bill suggests that organizations should "provide an applicant a gift certificate or other incentive upon enrollment."
Once registered into the state system, enrollees will be required to submit to mandatory health and weight screening, and a complete loss of medical privacy.
There is no uninsured crisis in Minnesota. The current rate of uninsured people is estimated at 7.2 percent. Demonstrably, the majority of those uninsured are without coverage by choice. Fifty-four percent of Minnesota’s uninsured are eligible for state assistance, but they choose not to enroll. The rest are eligible for employer group or individual plans, but have decided not to purchase the insurance.
The Insurance Exchange is an expensive solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. The rest of the plan attempts to put more people on the public dole, while raising taxes and fees, invading patient privacy and restricting individual freedoms.
Government is the problem, not the solution. Minnesota has the highest number of government-imposed insurance mandates in the country. Instead of allowing insurance companies to offer different products for different people, the goverment has mandated what must be included in every plan, thereby driving up the cost of insurance for everyone. Goverment has also errected barriers that prevent insurance companies from outside the state to compete for your business. Everyone knows that when there's competition within a marketplace, costs go down and quality goes up.
Adding more layers of bureaucracy and regulation won’t solve our health care problems. It will only exacerbate them. The solution lies in the free market. Offering consumers more choice in personalizing their health coverage plans by eliminating government mandates would immediately reduce the cost of coverage for most Minnesotans. A simple change in our tax code could eliminate the need for complicated plans like the Insurance Exchange by giving everyone the same tax deduction for health care expenditures. This would also help decouple insurance from a person’s employment situation, and make health insurance more portable.
TAKE ACTION: Click here to contact your state legislators now.
Be sure to read Craig Westover's recent columns in the Pioneer Press: The Devil's Not in the Detail, But Sitting in Plain Sight and A Sow's Ear of Corporate Socialism. Also take a look at It's Universal at Ladies Logic.
|
 |
|
Comments (27)
|
|
|
|
Design Flaw Responsible for 35W Bridge Collapse |
|
|
By Dan McGrath on
3/19/2008
|
|
|
 The NTSB released a fifth update of its findings on the 35W bridge collapse on March 17 th. The NTSB had previously cited too-thin gusset plates as a factor in the collapse and has now pinpointed the exact plates that failed and their location in the bridge structure.
The NTSB is now examining archival information provided by the original design consultants to determine how and why the bridge plans called for the thin gusset plates installed in 1967.
Following the bridge’s collapse, a number of lawmakers immediately took the stage to decry a lack of tax revenues as the cause, and some (like Senator Steve Murphy for example) went so far as to blame the current MNDOT administration and Governor Pawlenty’s office.
Transportation Funding, it seems had little or nothing to do with the bridge’s ultimate collapse. The bridge’s faulty design doomed it to fail from the day it was built. Despite the facts, politicians will likely continue to hearken back to the collapse of the 35W bridge as a catalyst to raise taxes for “transportation.”
|
 |
|
Comments (5)
|
|
|
|
Tax Cut Rally April 12th 2008 |
|
|
By Dan McGrath on
3/6/2008
|
|
|
|
High noon. Overtaxed Minnesotans will converge on the State Capitol on April 12th for an old-fashioned tax protest. Last year, Jason Lewis’ Tax Cut Coalition mustered over 7,000 people for the annual Tax Cut rally. Following the largest tax increase in state history, upwards of 10,000 people are expected this year.
Minnesota Majority will be at this event, which is expected to be historic in its proportions, and we have something extra special planned this year. Our legislators will have to sit up and take notice.
For more information about the Tax Cut Coalition, visit KTLKFM.com, and tune in to Jason Lewis weekdays, 4-7 at 100.3 FM. Listen for updates on the Tax Cut Rally from Jason and Minnesota Majority president, Jeff Davis over the coming weeks.
|
 |
|
Comments (4)
|
|
|
|
The Failure of Contraception-Based Sex-Ed |
|
|
By Dan McGrath on
3/3/2008
|
|
|
A new survey released this week by the Centers for Disease Control finds that 1 in 4 teenage girls (aged 14-19) is infected with a sexually transmitted disease. Among African American girls, the number doubles.
The most common infection is HPV, but cases of Chlamydia, Herpes and Trichomoniasis were also evident.
75% of public schools offer contraceptive-based sex education programs, as opposed to abstinence-based programs. It’s simple common sense that the only sure way to avoid pregnancy and STDs is abstinence, which begs the question of why modern sexual education focuses instead on contraception. It’s clear that today's most common education approach is failing our youth.
|
 |
|
Comments (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Featured Book
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
"Green Hell explains why Americans can't afford to fall for Al Gore's `the debate is over' line on global warming. While we're all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists."
--Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard
"Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth' on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous."
--Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes
"Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans."
--Dick Morris, FOX News commentator and former political consultant to Bill Clinton
"This book describes why the world can't afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists' vision of our future."
--VACLAV KLAUS, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic
"Free market capitalism is still the best path to prosperity. Green Hell is a must-read for anyone who wants to keep America on that path and away from Soviet-style command-and-control environmentalism."
--Larry Kudlow, Host, CNBC's The Kudlow Report
|
 |
|
 |
|