|
|
|
Author: |
Jeff Davis |
Created: |
10/17/2007 |
|
|
Highlighting stories of interest to those who embrace traditional values. |
|
Why Are MN Senators Co-Sponsoring The Largest Tax Increase in History? |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
5/29/2008
|
|
|
|
The U.S. Senate is scheduled to debate and vote on the Lieberman-Warner "Climate Security Act" (S.2191 / S.3036) next week. This bill effectively imposes a massive hidden tax on carbon emissions through a cap-and-trade scheme.
A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates the federal government stands to generate an additional $1.2 trillion in revenues over a seven-year period between 2012 and 2018. In addition, the CBO projects private-sector regulatory mandates would amount to more than $90 billion per year from 2012 to 2016.
The bill would result in an enormous expansion in government regulation and mandates, reducing our personal liberties. The Environmental Protection Agency would be charged with the daunting task of establishing emissions allowances for thousands of American manufacturers and electricity generators. A diagram developed by the Chamber of Commerce reveals the pervasiveness of this new regulation (go here for an explanation of the chart).
A recent Wall Street Journal column concludes the Lieberman-Warner bill would be "the most extensive government reorganization of the American economy since the 1930s." An analysis by the Heritage Foundation estimates a $1.7 trillion to $4.8 trillion loss in U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) between 2010 and 2030. U.S. job losses could exceed 700,000 in 2015 alone. At this same time, American consumers would be faced with dramatic price increases in food and energy, putting a significant strain on family budgets.
The impacts in Minnesota are just as dramatic. Projections for Minnesota indicate we could see over $2 billion loss in Gross State Product , $2.3 billion loss in personal income and a loss of over 55,000 jobs by 2030. According to the Heritage Foundation, Minnesota is projected to rank #1 in the nation in job losses per capita.
With energy prices at record highs, the last thing we need is more government regulation that will drive-up the costs of gas, drive jobs out of our state and make us all poorer while special interests line their pockets with the spoils. But for some reason, Minnesota Senators Amy Klobuchar and Norm Coleman have both decided to co-sponsor this legislation. They need to hear from concerned Minnesotans as soon as possible A vote on this bill could come in the next several days.
TAKE ACTION: Visit www.NoCapAndTrade.com to sign a petition and send an urgent message to your elected officials urging them to reject the Lieberman-Warner bill.
Additional Resources:
|
 |
|
Comments (2)
|
|
|
|
The 2008 Minnesota Legislative Session in Review: Hype vs. Reality |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
5/23/2008
|
|
|
|
The 85th legislature adjourned on Sunday, May 18 and at that very moment, the 2008 election season began. What had originally been four months of highly contentious legislative wrestling is now being portrayed as “one of the most successful sessions in decades.” At Monday’s press conference, legislative leaders from both sides of the aisle flanked the governor and touted the accomplishments of the 2008 session.
The DFL-controlled legislature had an aggressive agenda from the very beginning of the session to raise taxes, increase government spending, expand regulations and implement social engineering programs. While Republican minority leaders fought valiantly to block most of these measures, some caucus members broke ranks with leadership, thereby allowing some of these bills to slip through.
Thankfully, Governor Pawlenty vetoed many bills such as Legalized Gestational Surrogacy, Infant DNA Warehousing and Local Government Domestic Partnerships. But the governor’s veto of the Transportation bill was overridden by six wayward Republican House members, thereby allowing one of the largest tax increases in Minnesota’s history to be passed into law.
The sound bytes being fed to Minnesotans by the mainstream media don’t begin to tell the whole story behind the 2008 legislative session. Our analysis seeks to separate the hype from the reality, thereby allowing Minnesotans to assess what they really got out of this year’s session.
Hype: A $935 million budget deficit was erased and the budget balanced without raising taxes.
Reality: The budget fix was nothing more than a band-aid and taxes were raised – significantly. Lest we forget, the override of the governor’s transportation bill veto cost us a $6.6 billion tax increase on sales, fuel and vehicle registrations. And if approved by voters this November, Minnesotans will be paying more in state sales taxes to fund arts programs and wildlife habitat.
The final budget deal also included a $125 million tax increase on corporations with foreign operations. This was sold to the public as “closing a corporate loophole,” as if corporations were doing something underhanded. In reality, this provision was enacted by the state legislature years ago to avoid driving corporations with foreign operations out of Minnesota.
Senate Minority Leader David Senjem (R - Rochester) cautioned that the fix relied too heavily on tapping the state's “rainy day” reserve fund and not enough on actual spending cuts. Nearly $500 million needed to balance the budget came from the state’s rainy day fund, tapping about 80% of the fund’s reserves. Senjem predicts the result will be a much worse budget problem in 2009.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hype: A 3.9% property tax cap resulting in $460 million in property tax reductions.
Reality: When does a tax increase become a reduction? When the government doesn’t raise taxes as much as they otherwise would, it’s billed as a tax cut. This is like expecting to gain 30 pounds and stepping on the scale to discover only a 20-pound gain. Using legislative math, that’s a ten-pound weight loss.
Most politicians somehow failed to mention that while they were creating the property tax “cap”, they were simultaneously increasing local government aid by $60 million. This sleight of hand maneuver essentially took taxpayer money out of one pocket and put it in another, thereby diluting the real impact of the property tax “cap”.
The so-called “cap” includes exemptions that allow communities to exceed 3.9%. Local governments can exceed the cap for things like population growth and emergency services. The cap also doesn’t include local school district referendums. And what happens when cities blow their budgets on non-essentials and then need more funding for police and fire departments, or when the cap expires in three years time? This “cap” is really more like an open-top visor. In reality, many Minnesotans will see property tax increases that well exceed 3.9% and their projected “savings” to Minnesota taxpayers will be nowhere near the claimed $460 million.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hype: Nation-leading health care reform that includes increased transparency, pay for performance, e-prescribing and tax credits.
Reality: While there are some positive aspects of the health care bill like greater consumer transparency and electronic prescriptions, its major thrust is to grow government involvement and enroll more families onto state-subsidized health care. Families making up to $57,000 now qualify for state welfare health plans, adding thousands of new people to taxpayer-funded health care. The bill adds insult to injury by offering a bounty to outfits (schools, non-profit groups, insurance brokers, etc) that recruit new dependents to feed at the public trough.
Grants are doled-out to local community health boards (more government bureaucracy) to try to enforce lifestyle changes targeting weight-loss and smoking cessation.
Government bureaucrats are given the power to define “quality,” determine physician compensation incentives based upon this definition and even decide what procedures are medically necessary.
Bottom line: this bill expands government involvement in health care, which will ultimately result in higher costs for patients and taxpayers. Unmet hospital costs resulting from the legislation will mean non-subsidized families will see an increase in their insurance premiums and doctor bills. Taxpayers will pick up the tab for the thousands of new people added to welfare health plans.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hype: The Central Corridor light rail line will ease traffic congestion and improve the environment.
Reality: The Central Corridor line, like the Hiawatha line, will be built at traffic grade, meaning it will significantly interfere with automotive traffic and eliminate most street parking. Delays at intersections will mean more idling vehicles, more congestion, more wasted fuel and more exhaust emissions. For some reason, no study was conducted to compare the rail transit proposal to bus transit for the Central Corridor.
The real reason Minnesota lawmakers allocated $70 million for the Central Corridor this session was that the state was in jeopardy of loosing $450 million in federal funding for the project. Even at that, it begs the question of where the rest of the money is going to come from to build a line that will cost more than $1 billion. The construction costs are just the first installment. Most, if not all, light rail lines across the country operate at a net loss and rely upon significant ongoing taxpayer funding to stay afloat. This means Minnesota taxpayers will have to annually ante-up on this boondoggle project for years to come.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So, in the end, how did everyday Minnesotans really fare out of the session? Our approach to answering this question is to evaluate the session’s results within the context of some of our core values:
Q. Were there any meaningful reductions in government spending?
A. No. Despite this year’s budget deficit, the state legislature actually increased spending by 9.8%. House Minority Leader Rep. Marty Seifert (R – Marshall) said, “It is unfortunate that private sector job growth took a backburner to an expensive and explosive growth in government programs and services.”
Q. Were there reductions in taxes?
A. No, in fact there was a record $6.6 billion tax increase with the transportation bill. And other legislation, like the Green Solutions Act, sets the stage for the implementation of a carbon cap and trade system that will levy a huge tax increase upon all energy consumption in our state in the future.
Q. Were there reductions in the government’s involvement in the lives of everyday citizens?
A. No, in fact there were increases in government involvement in areas like ticket sales, teen drivers and car windows. Creeping socialism was especially evident in the health care legislation with tobacco and weight control funding while building a nice long electronic list for universal health care.
Q. Did the legislature create a more business-friendly environment that would encourage businesses to come to Minnesota?
A. No, in fact they made our business climate less friendly to business. Case in point – Northwest and Delta declined to locate their newly merged corporate headquarters in Minnesota.
Q. Did the legislature pass laws that encouraged greater personal responsibility?
A. No, in fact the state created additional dependents with legislation like the health care bill.
Q. Did the legislature protect our state’s sovereignty by combating the problem of illegal aliens?
A. No. While Governor Pawlenty did issue a number of executive orders strengthening laws to combat illegal aliens, the DFL-controlled legislature resisted all attempts to pass this type of legislation. This is hard to imagine in a year when four innocent children lost their lives as a result of an illegal alien.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Who were the real winners out of this year’s session? Clearly it was the special interests. Folks like the Ghermezian Brothers who can now build their new Mall of America parking lot on the backs of local property owners. Or the construction companies that lobbied hard for the $6.6 billion transportation tax increase that can now line their pockets with the proceeds. And don’t forget the $38 million expansion for the Duluth Entertainment and Convention Center.
The best thing we can say about the 2008 legislative session is that it is finally over. The damage could have been a lot worse, but it also begs the question, “Is this the best that Minnesotans can expect from their elected officials?” In our humble opinion, voters will need to make some dramatic changes in their representation this November if they want to see different outcomes in the next biennium.
|
 |
|
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
Compare the Treatment of Our Veterans |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
3/26/2008
|
|
|
|
This 3 minute video from ABC's "Person of the Week" provides a stark contrast to the treatment that VETS FOR FREEDOM received when trying to visit Forest Lake High School. High school administrators and those who organized the protest threat resulting in the cancellation of the presentation at the school would do well to watch this video and learn the meaning of true patriotism.
|
 |
|
Comments (0)
|
|
|
|
Veterans Not Welcome at Forest Lake High School |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
3/25/2008
|
|
|
|

A national tour featuring decorated veterans from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan was scheduled to stop this week at Forest Lake Area High School. But just hours before the event, school administrators abruptly canceled the visit.
Forest Lake High School principal Steve Massey says he canceled the appearance by the Vets for Freedom because he didn't want politics in the classroom. But the truth of the matter is that Mr. Massey succumbed to pressure from radical left wing activists that threatened to stage a protest at the school.
Pete Hegseth, a Forest Lake High grad and the director of Vets for Freedom, said that he had talked with school officials during the planning process, and made clear that presenters would not make political statements. "It's Iraq and Afghan veterans talking about what they saw and what they did there, and about what it means to put on the uniform of your country," he said.
Star Tribune columnist Katherine Kersten said it best in her column this week: “Shame on Forest Lake High administrators for caving to political pressure under the guise of preventing political pressure. Apparently, they only understand the sort of political pressure exerted by left-wing anti-war groups.” It is appalling that high school students are not allowed to hear from the men and women who have risked their lives protect our country because of threats from Left wing protesters.
You can weigh-in on this incident with some of the people involved in the cancellation. Contact Steve Massey, the principal of Forest Lake Area High School, and let him know what you think about his decision to cancel the event. You can also contact Contact Karl Bremer, one of the organizers of the protest threat resulting in the school's cancellation decision.
|
 |
|
Comments (7)
|
|
|
|
Reagan on Socialized Medicine |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
3/18/2008
|
|
|
|
In 1961, then private citizen Ronald Reagan partnered with the American Medical Association to record this 10 minute speech that was to become part of what was known as Operation Coffee Cup (OCC). OCC was a campaign conducted by the American Medical Association (AMA) in opposition to the Democrats' plans to extend Social Security to include health insurance for the elderly, later known as Medicare. As part of the program, doctors' wives would organize coffee meetings and play the Reagan recording to convince acquaintances to write letters to Congress opposing the program. Reagan's arguments against socialized medicine ring as true today as they did over 40 years ago. Minnesota state legislators pushing for increased government involvement in health care should take a moment to reflect on Reagan's comments.
|
 |
|
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
If We Adopt Socialized Medicine, Where Will Canadians Go For Their Health Care? |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
3/14/2008
|
|
|
|
Want to get a first hand look at government controlled health care? Watch this brief video and see how a Canadian was forced to seek care in the United States in order to save his life.
Some Minnesota politicians believe that Minnesota should adopt a health care plan similar to that of Canada. But these politicians would do well to consider some of the outcomes associated with the Canadian system, such as:
- Waits up to 5 days in Emergency rooms
- Three-year waiting list for a pain clinic
- Waits of four months for radiation therapy for cancer patients
- Declining enrollment in medical school resulting in too few doctors and nurses
- Closing hospitals to save costs
- 12 % of Canadians can’t find a family physician.
There are countless examples of why adopting a Canadian-style health care program is bad public policy for Minnesota.
|
 |
|
Comments (5)
|
|
|
|
Majority of DFL Reps Favor Sanctuary Cities Continuing to Harbor Illegals |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
3/13/2008
|
|
|
Today a majority of DFL state representatives voted in favor of a motion to squash a potential vote on HF3010, a bill to prohibit sanctuary cities from harboring illegal aliens in Minnesota. Cities like as Minneapolis and St. Paul have sanctuary policies that prevent police officers from inquiring about immigration status or enforcing immigration laws. These policies are allowing illegal aliens to openly enjoy the benefits of citizenship without the fear of deportation.
The DFL-controlled House has been trying to stall HF 3010, hoping to have the bill simply die in committee. Today the bill's chief author, Rep. Paul Kols (R, Victoria), made a motion to pull the bill directly to the House floor for an up-or-down vote. But Rep. Tony Sertich (DFL, Chisholm) then made a motion to table the Kols’ motion. The Sertich motion prevailed (click here to see the voting record - a vote in favor of the Sertch motion was a vote in favor of sanctuary cities).
Sanctuary city policies cause a host of financial, legal and criminal problems that negatively affect the quality of life for legitimate Minnesota citizens. The recent bus crash in Cottonwood is a tragic reminder of this fact and should have been a wake-up call to our state legislators to get tough on illegal immigration. But most DFL representatives don't seem to be getting the message.
Here's a link to an Action Alert we just issued urging citizens to contact their representatives on this measure.
|
 |
|
Comments (1)
|
|
|
|
There's Still a Chance of Blocking a Portion of the Tax Increases |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
2/28/2008
|
|
|
|
Minnesota Majority has learned that each of the seven metro County Boards must adopt a formal resolution in order to put the sales tax and vehicle excise tax into effect within their respective counties. This means that should a Board fail to adopt the resolution, the tax increases will not go into effect within that county. Nearly 100% of the $1.1 billion sales and excise tax increase will be dedicated to boondoggle mass transit programs which will have very little, if any benefit for residents in some counties. If enough citizens revolt and contact their County Commissioners, there's a chance they could block these tax increases from being implemented in their counties. We have established an Action Alert providing individuals with the contact information for their County Commissioners.
|
 |
|
Comments (16)
|
|
|
|
Budget Forecast Predicts Nearly $1 Billion Deficit |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
2/28/2008
|
|
|
What a difference a year makes. Last year, Minnesota was sitting on a $2 billion budget surplus. Today Governor Tim Pawlenty announced that Minnesota is facing a projected budget deficit of $935 million. State revenues have slowed as both individual and corporate income tax collections have fallen. At the same time, state spending has increased. By all accounts, Minnesota is currently in a mild recession which is expected to last for at least the next six months.
Minnesota is required to balance its books every two years, suggesting that the state must now either cut spending or raise taxes. On the heals of the DFL-controlled state legislature just passing the single largest tax increase in the state’s history, Pawlenty was clear – he intends to cut spending. “Raising taxes is not the answer to balancing our budget. Like families and businesses are doing in this tough economy, government needs to tighten its belt and live within its means. I will not allow this session to turn into a parade of DFL tax hikes", said Pawlenty.
DFL legislative leaders may have other plans. They announced at least two initiatives to raise new tax revenues: going after corporations that operate overseas and collect taxes on business executives who work in Minnesota but declare residency elsewhere. For now, however, DFL leaders appear to be holding off on re-introducing last year's proposal for an income tax rate hike. They appear wary to propose more tax increases given the intense negative public reaction to their massive transit tax increase that was just passed by an override of the Governor's veto.
|
 |
|
Comments (2)
|
|
|
|
Legislature Passes Largest Tax Increase in State's History |
|
|
By Jeff Davis on
2/25/2008
|
|
|
Today the Minnesota State Legislature voted to override Governor Pawlenty's veto of the $6.6 billion transit bill, thus passing into law one of the largest tax increases in our state's history. Legislators voted in favor of this massive tax increase in spite of recent polls showing the majority of Minnesotans opposed this bill. Legislators voted in favor of this bill in spite of receiving thousands of phone calls and emails from their constituents urging them to support the Governor's veto.
As a result of this vote, Minnesota will now have one of the highest gas taxes in the nation. A new sales tax will be imposed upon a majority of Minnesotans without a referendum allowing the people to have a voice in this decision. And those who purchase a new vehicle will pay a significantly higher personal property tax each year over the life of the vehicle. In the end, all Minnesotans will pay more - an average of $300 to $400 annually per household. And these new taxes are regressive, hitting those who can least afford it the hardest.
Some legislators tried to exploit the tragic I-35W bridge collapse to justify this bill, even though NSTB reports indicate the bridge collapse was likely due to a design flaw, not a lack of maintenance. Some legislators tried to sell this as jobs bill, claiming that over 33,000 high-paying jobs would be created when, in fact, further investigation revealed that fewer than 2,000 construction jobs would actually result. Many legislators who voted for this bill told constituents that MnDOT said it needed an additional $2 to 3 billion dollars a year to fund its needs. What these legislators did not share with their constituents, however, is that these figures represented a "wish list" of every conceivable transportation project MnDOT thought it might ever do. Many of the projects on this list would never be completed because they were infeasible. An example of one such project is the addition of lanes on I-94 between Minneapolis and St. Paul which could never happen because it was too expensive to “take” all the private property – residences and businesses – that would be necessary to expand the highway).
The bill passed today allocates 100% of the metro sales tax increase to the mass transit boondoggle (a total of $1.1 billion over ten years) versus fixing our roads and bridges. The bill pass today still relies upon pork-barrel allocation formulas for channeling gas tax revenues to areas other than those which need it the most.
There were other options available to finance Minnesota's transportation needs. But the state legislature decided to raise your taxes instead of cutting spending or making use of bonding. What may be most disappointing about this vote is that it suggests that a majority of our state legislators do not have the people's best interests in mind. It suggests that they care more about special interest groups that stand to benefit from this bill than their constituents who will be forced to pay for it. Perhaps it's time for the people to get serious about taking back their government. Perhaps it's time for a change in whose representing your interests at our state capitol.
|
 |
|
Comments (14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Featured Book
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
"Green Hell explains why Americans can't afford to fall for Al Gore's `the debate is over' line on global warming. While we're all for the environment, Green Hell explains why we need to oppose the environmentalists."
--Fred Barnes, Executive Editor, the Weekly Standard
"Green Hell is the `inconvenient truth' on extremist, growth-killing environmentalism. A must-read for those interested in keeping America free and prosperous."
--Steve Forbes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Forbes
"Regardless of whether you believe global warming is a fraud, the fact is that the current depression, the past spike in oil prices, and the coming technology of electric cars are all going to solve whatever problem exists. Liberals want to use climate change as an excuse to take over the economy and regulate everything and this book exposes their plans."
--Dick Morris, FOX News commentator and former political consultant to Bill Clinton
"This book describes why the world can't afford to fall for global warming alarmism and environmental hysteria. Steve Milloy shows how to avoid the environmentalists' vision of our future."
--VACLAV KLAUS, President of the European Union and President of the Czech Republic
"Free market capitalism is still the best path to prosperity. Green Hell is a must-read for anyone who wants to keep America on that path and away from Soviet-style command-and-control environmentalism."
--Larry Kudlow, Host, CNBC's The Kudlow Report
|
 |
|
 |
|